Close
Back
Download NATO’s broadcast-quality video content free of charge
Log in
No account?
Forgot your password?
NATO MULTIMEDIA ACCOUNT
Access NATO’s broadcast-quality video content free of charge
Create an account
Check your inbox and enter verification code
We have sent a verification code to your email address.
.
Enter the code to verify your account. This code will expire in 30 minutes.
You have successfully created your account
From now on you can download videos from our website
Subscribe to our newsletter
If you would also like to subscribe to the newsletter and receive our latest updates, click on the button below.
Reset password
Enter the email address you registered with and we will send you a code to reset your password.
Reset password
We have sent a verification code to your email address.
Enter the code to verify your account. This code will expire in 30 minutes.
Create a new password
The password must be at least 12 characters long, no spaces, include upper/lowercase letters, numbers and symbols.
Your password has been updated
Click the button to return to the page you were on and log in with your new password.
NATO rejects the allegations made by Mr. Dick Marty that there was some kind of “NATO framework” associated with purported CIA activities in Europe. There has, quite simply, never been a secret agreement along the lines described by Mr. Dick Marty in this report to the Council of Europe.
Soon after the terrorist attacks of Sept 11th, 2001, the North Atlantic Council agreed on eight measures to support the US regarding implementation of Article 5 of the Washington Treaty – which were, at the time, made public. They included an agreement to provide blanket clearances for military flights, in accordance with national procedures. The relevant clause says that NATO countries agree to "provide blanket over flight clearances for the US and other Allies' aircraft, in accordance with the necessary air traffic arrangements and national procedures, for military flights related to operations against terrorism". Any military flights covered by this agreement, and the relevant air traffic control would have been arranged bilaterally; NATO would have had no role.