From now on you can download videos from our website
If you would also like to subscribe to the newsletter and receive our latest updates, click on the button below.
Enter the email address you registered with and we will send you a code to reset your password.
Didn't receive a code? Send new Code
The password must be at least 12 characters long, no spaces, include upper/lowercase letters, numbers and symbols.
Click the button to return to the page you were on and log in with your new password.
In accordance with the decision taken at the North Atlantic Co-operation Council meeting on 18th December 1992, an Ad Hoc Group on Co-operation in Peacekeeping was established with the aim of developing a common understanding on the political principle
In accordance with the decision taken at the North Atlantic Co-operation Council meeting on 18th December 1992 , an Ad Hoc Group on Co-operation in Peacekeeping was established with the aim of developing a common understanding on the political principles of and the tools for peacekeeping, and to share experience and thereby develop common practical approaches and co-operation in support of peacekeeping under the responsibility of the UN or the CSCE.
There is no single, generally accepted definition of peacekeeping. There is a need to develop a common understanding of peacekeeping, proceeding from the definitions and concepts of peacekeeping contained in the relevant UN and CSCE documents, including the UN Secretary General's Agenda for Peace. Traditionally, peacekeeping has been used to describe operations based on Chapter VI of the UN Charter. Operations similar to those conducted under Chapter VI may be carried out under the authority of the CSCE on the basis of the 1992 Helsinki Document. Operations based on recent extensions of the concept of peacekeeping, aimed at the protection or establishment of peace and based on Chapter VII of the UN Charter, have been carried out under the authority of the UN Security Council.
In considering NACC co-operation in peacekeeping, the following definitions may be useful:
Conflict Prevention
Includes different activities, in particular, under Chapter VI of the UN Charter, ranging from diplomatic initiatives to preventive deployment of troops, intended to prevent disputes from escalating into armed conflicts or from spreading.Conflict prevention can include fact-finding missions, consultation, warnings, inspections and monitoring.Preventive deployments normally consist of civilians and/or military forces being deployed to avert a crisis.
Peacemaking
Diplomatic actions conducted after the commencement of conflict, with the aim of establishing a peaceful settlement. They can include the provision of good offices, mediation, conciliation and such actions as diplomatic isolation and sanctions.
Peacekeeping
Peacekeeping, narrowly defined, is the containment, moderation and/or termination of hostilities between or within States, through the medium of an impartial third party intervention, organised and directed internationally; using military forces, and civilians to complement the political process of conflict resolution and to restore and maintain peace.
Peacekeeping operations based on Chapter VI of the UN Charter have traditionally involved the deployment of a peacekeeping force in the field, with the consent of the parties, including supervising demarcation lines, monitoring ceasefires and controlling buffer zones, disarming and demobilising warring factions and supervising borders.Over the past few years, the UN has significantly expanded the type of military operations carried out under "peacekeeping", to include for example protection of humanitarian relief and refugee operations. Peacekeeping operations may also contain substantial civilian elements, usually under the command of a civilian head of mission, such as civilian police, electoral or human rights monitors.
Peace-enforcement
Action under Chapter VII of the UN Charter using military means to restore peace in an area of conflict.This can include dealing with an inter-State conflict or with internal conflict to meet a humanitarian need or where state institutions have largely collapsed.
Peace-building
Post-conflict action to identify and support structures which will tend to strengthen and solidify a political settlement in order to avoid a return to conflict.It includes mechanisms to identify and support structures which will tend to consolidate peace, advance a sense of confidence and well-being and support economic reconstruction, and may require military as well as civilian involvement.
The following general principles served as guidelines for the preparation of the more detailed criteria and operational principles outlined further in Section 3.
The following are intended to apply equally to preventive deployment, peacekeeping and peace-enforcement, unless otherwise indicated.
a. Criteria
The basis for any mission is a clear and precise mandate of the UN or the CSCE, developed through consultations with contributing States and organisations and/or interested parties, covering all of the essential elements of the operation to be performed.
Consent and co-operation of the parties to the conflict are essential prerequisites for a UN peacekeeping operation based on Chapter VI of the UN Charter or for a CSCE peacekeeping operation.Exceptions are possible only if an operation has been based on Chapter VII of the Charter by the UN Security Council.
The goals and means of implementation of an operation and the relationship between them need to be as transparent as possible, compatible with operational requirements.
Impartiality
All aspects of an operation need to be conducted impartially, in a manner compatible with the nature of the operation, as defined by its mandate.
The contributors to the mission should have, and be seen to have, the political will and capability to accomplish the objectives of the mandate.
Credibility is essential for the success of an operation, and depends, inter alia, on the political determination demonstrated by the international organisations and States concerned and on clear and achievable military and/or other aims, on the availability of sufficient material resources and on the quality and training of the personnel involved.
The planning and execution of a mission need to be at all times consistent with the aims and objectives to be achieved.
It will ultimately be up to the mandating body (UN or the CSCE), together with those implementing the operation, to assess respect for the two latter criteria.
b. Operational Principles
Unity of command of military forces is essential.
Use of force
In all types of operations, the extent to which force can be used needs to be clearly defined either in the mandate or in the terms of reference.
A commitment to the protection of personnel involved in an operation should be inherent in the decision to conduct an operation.
All member states of the mandating body (UN or CSCE) are eligible to volunteer.
Missions should have adequate financing.In general, costs are the collective responsibility of the member States of the mandating body (UN or CSCE) and will be shared on the basis of the rules applied by that body.
The following guidelines apply to programmes and activities of the Ad Hoc Group.
Cooperative activities in peacekeeping cannot be conducted if they are not properly funded.The initial measures set out in Part III below, as far as they concern courses, seminars or workshops organised by member countries of the North Atlantic Co-operation Council, are based on the following pattern:unless otherwise agreed, the organising country bears the cost for the local expenses, including board and lodging, while the travelling expenses will be borne by the participants. The Ad Hoc Group will, as the need arises, develop financial considerations as appropriate.
a. Objectives:
To develop a common understanding of operational concepts and requirements for peacekeeping by exchanging experiences, ideas, and doctrines; to examine concepts and doctrine with a view to the development of common guidelines in support of peacekeeping.
b. Actions:
c. Elements for further development
Continuation of an organised exchange of experiences within the Ad Hoc Group building on the results of the Prague seminar, with a view to the further development of common guidelines in support of peacekeeping, set out in paragraphs 1 to 6 of this report.
To identify and examine principal planning issues, commencing initially with key issues such as command and control; to compare and harmonise planning methods and procedures, so as to facilitate the ability of Partners to co-operate practically in peacekeeping and to develop an understanding of assets required and resources available for contributions both to preparations for peacekeeping and to peacekeeping operations themselves.
b. Actions:
To facilitate co-operative peacekeeping planning activity, starting with a discussion in the Ad Hoc Group.Discussions should cover initially:
c. Elements for further development
Each of the areas set out at b. above should be the subject of reports to the Ad Hoc Group by the Military Authorities.There were valuable results in this respect at the meeting of the MCCS with Co-operation Partners on 28th April. Further reports should cover:
a. Objectives:
To identify technical aspects of peacekeeping in order to develop a common basis and understanding.These might include, interalia, terminology, interoperability issues, and procedural matters.
b. Actions:
c. Elements for further development
The following are areas on which the group might focus initially in considering interoperability issues
Further details on a number of these areas are dealt with in paragraphs 10 and 11. Proposals for development of these elements will be considered by the Ad Hoc Technical Sub-Group.
To share experiences and to develop practical co-operation in the fields of training, education and exercises, in order to develop common training standards, enhance interoperability and improve operational effectiveness.
b. Actions:
It is proposed that discussions and exchanges on peacekeeping training use the following framework.For Units, Commanders and Staff Personnel:
Further detail on (1) to (3) above is attached as Annex B.
The Ad Hoc Technical Sub-Group should examine these issues further in the light of the seminars and courses which have now been arranged.
To identify specific logistics issues within peacekeeping operations and to consider possibilities for co-operation in the logistics area.
b. Actions:
The International Staff will submit detailed proposals to the Ad Hoc Group for taking these issues further, on the basis of contributions by NACC member states and NATO's military authorities, taking into account the results of the logistics seminar to be held in Norway.In this context consideration might be given to the need to establish an Ad Hoc Logistics Sub-Group
Summary of Report by Netherlands Delegation on the Workshop on Communications for Peacekeeping Operations
The workshop on communications for peacekeeping operations was held from 10th to 14th May 1993 at the Netherlands Defence College near the Hague.The aim of this workshop was to formulate recommendations for the installation and the use of effective communications in peacekeeping operations, as a contribution to practical co-operation in peacekeeping between North Atlantic Co-operation Council (NACC) partners.Experts from 20 nations and NATO Headquarters participated in the workshop.
On the first day, after the workshop was opened by the Netherlands Minister of Defence A.L. Ter Beek, representatives of NATO, Canada, Poland and the Netherlands made presentations on the following topics:the political background, aims and work of the NACC and the NACC Ad Hoc Group on Co-operation in peacekeeping; practical experience gained in crisis management operations; command and control for peacekeeping operations; and communications systems required for such operations.
The second and third day were devoted to practical work.Four working groups were set up to formulate recommendations for resolving practical problems, in particular the communication requirements for peacekeeping operations and interoperability issues.
These working groups recommended that Satellite Communications (SATCOM), backed up by high frequency (HF) radio systems, should be used as the main communications system.There would also be requirements for messengers and secure communications devices.In addition, civil telephone systems (PTT) would be extremely useful if available.
As to interoperability, the working groups identified three major problem areas:language; procedures; and techniques.
In their view, the use of relatively simple and robust communications systems, standardisation of equipment, role specialisation and common agreed procedures would enhance interoperability.
Furthermore, it was recommended that a database containing transmission characteristics of all communications equipment should be developed in order to reduce the risk of incompatibility.It would also be preferable to use, to the extent possible, commercial equipment based on the same technical standards.The variety in the types of equipment should be kept within strict limits.the exchange of liaison officers with their own equipment would also help ensure communications between the various contingents.
Finally, it was recommended that a NACC communications staff be established to address the communications planning and interoperability issues associated with peacekeeping operations.
At the end of this successful workshop, participants concluded that the discussions had been extremely useful and that follow-up work should be considered.
Including, inter alia, personal weapon handling, driving, map reading, first aid, communications skills.
Including, inter alia, specialised driving techniques or equipment, training of mine awareness and clearing, medical, patrolling, surveillance techniques, check point duties, vehicle/personnel searching, interview techniques, negotiations, staff and command procedures.
Including, inter alia, basic geographic, historical, cultural, political, economic and religious information; background and current details on the conflict situation; the mandate; military tasks; rules of engagement; public relations; fundamental linguistic expressions; other (military, information on other participants involved in the operation (military and civil).