NATO MULTIMEDIA ACCOUNT

Access NATO’s broadcast-quality video content free of charge

Register

Create an account

Create an account

Check your inbox and enter verification code

We have sent a verification code to your email address. . Enter the code to verify your account. This code will expire in 30 minutes.
Verification code

Didn't receive a code? Send new Code

You have successfully created your account

From now on you can download videos from our website

Subscribe to our newsletter

If you would also like to subscribe to the newsletter and receive our latest updates, click on the button below.

Reset password

Enter the email address you registered with and we will send you a code to reset your password.

Reset password
Check your inbox and enter verification code
We have sent a verification code to your email address. Enter the code to verify your account. This code will expire in 30 minutes.
Verification code

Didn't receive a code? Send new Code

Create a new password

The password must be at least 12 characters long, no spaces, include upper/lowercase letters, numbers and symbols.

Your password has been updated

Click the button to return to the page you were on and log in with your new password.

The first in a series of meetings to be held on the issue of missile defence took place at NATO HQ on 8 May, following President Bush's speech in Washington on 1 May. A delegation of representatives from the US Administration, led by Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Marc Grossman, and Deputy National Security Adviser, Steve Hadley, explained President Bush's latest thinking on missile defence to NATO Secretary General, Lord Robertson, and the North Atlantic Council - NATO's top decision-making body.

At a press conference after the meeting, the US team explained that Allies were being fully consulted on the issue, adding that the debate on missile defence had to be placed within a wider context of future strategic stability and deterrence, where new threats such as the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction would need to be addressed.