NATO MULTIMEDIA ACCOUNT

Access NATO’s broadcast-quality video content free of charge

Register

Create an account

Create an account

Check your inbox and enter verification code

We have sent a verification code to your email address. . Enter the code to verify your account. This code will expire in 30 minutes.
Verification code

Didn't receive a code? Send new Code

You have successfully created your account

From now on you can download videos from our website

Subscribe to our newsletter

If you would also like to subscribe to the newsletter and receive our latest updates, click on the button below.

Reset password

Enter the email address you registered with and we will send you a code to reset your password.

Reset password
Check your inbox and enter verification code
We have sent a verification code to your email address. Enter the code to verify your account. This code will expire in 30 minutes.
Verification code

Didn't receive a code? Send new Code

Create a new password

The password must be at least 12 characters long, no spaces, include upper/lowercase letters, numbers and symbols.

Your password has been updated

Click the button to return to the page you were on and log in with your new password.

The further improvement of civil preparedness for possible terrorist attacks with chemical, biological or radiological weapons against civilian populations was the main topic of the semi-annual meeting of the Senior Civil Emergency Planning Committee.

Heads of the national civil emergency planning organisations of NATO and Partner countries met at NATO HQ on 6-7 November and held meetings with the 27 Partners, the seven invited countries, and with Russia in the framework of the NATO-Russia Council.

The delegates reviewed progress made in the implementation of the Civil Emergency Planning Action Plan and discussed the way ahead for several important projects. These include an inventory of national capabilities; non-binding guidelines and minimum standards for planning, training, procedures, and equipment; critical infrastructure protection; and a framework border-crossing agreement for civilian relief units. The committee furthermore reviewed lessons learned from the Euro-Atlantic Disaster Response Coordination Centre’s support to Turkey in March-April 2003 and from its recent exercises in Uzbekistan (‘Ferghana 2003’) and Romania (‘Dacia 2003’). Several other important issues, such as civil support to non-Article 5 crisis response operations and military support to civil consequence management were also discussed.