| Title | Document type |
Final Communiqué - Ministerial Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Sintra, Portugal29 May. 1997 to collective defence, and a strong transatlantic partnership will remain the backbone of the Alliance's success in this endeavour. We are determined to raise to a qualitatively new level our political and military cooperation with our Partners, building upon | Official text, Pressrelease |
Political Implications of NATO Enlargement28 Apr. 1997 , not only many military exercises for peacekeeping operations with them, but have operated already for more than 1 1/4 year in Bosnia-Herzegovina together with them in a unique coalition for peace: IFOR, now SFOR. If at the end of the eighties somebody had | Opinion |
Speech by the Secretary General17 Jan. 1997 for shaping our security environment. NATO, therefore, would have to make an active effort to help its former adversaries to become stable and confident democracies, with military structures firmly under democratic control. Finally, NATO determined | Opinion |
The New NATO and the European Security Architecture Speech by the Secretary General16 Jan. 1997 these objectives by building on the success of Partnership for Peace in preparing Partners to work alongside NATO forces. It is no exaggeration to say that the Partnership provides the most intensive programme of military-to-military cooperation ever conceived | Opinion |
L'Alliance à la veille du XXIe siècle Discours du Secrétaire général à l'Institut royal des relations internationales14 Jan. 1997 consultation we would also have mutual representation at our military headquarters, starting at the top and eventually extending throughout the command structure. Our successful cooperation in Bosnia is a model on which to build. You all know | Opinion |
Press Briefing By Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Walter Slocombe and U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO Robert E. H...17 Dec. 1996 , and they are, in part, what would come out of this analysis with the military implications. As you know, and as your question implies, both countries in Central Europe and the Russians have raised questions about what changes in NATO's -- and the countries | Opinion |
Final Communiqué issued at the Ministerial Meeting of the North Atlantic Council10 Dec. 1996 . The Alliance is resolved to preserve its political and military strength, ensuring its ability to carry out the full range of its missions - as IFOR and its planned successor SFOR in Bosnia and Herzegovina clearly show. We have issued a separate statement | Official text, Pressrelease |
1996 Civil Protection Committee Seminar with Cooperation Partners in L'viv, Ukraine on 18th and 19th September 199618 Sep. 1996 to attend. Immediately following the seminar, the Civil Protection Committee, which is the focal point within the Alliance for all NATO and Partner countries regarding pre-disaster planning and post-disaster analysis, will conduct a meeting | Pressrelease |
Follow-on to the 1993 Athens Report on Cooperation in Peacekeeping06 Dec. 1995 and learn lessons from peacekeeping operations, the Political Military Steering Committee/Ad Hoc Group on Cooperation in Peacekeeping has become aware of the need to elaborate on the principles contained in the Athens Report better to reflect recent | Official text, Pressrelease |
NATO's response to proliferation of weapons of mass destruction29 Nov. 1995 : they are multi-faceted, multi-directional, and hard to predict and assess. Proliferation of nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) weapons(2) poses a military risk to the Alliance and can lead to direct military threats. Proliferation must be taken into account | News |
