| Title | Document type |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Mr. J. Luns.02 Jun. 1983 decision on INF modernisation and arms control - strategic concept of flexible response and forward defence - US and Canadian forces in Europe - support and assistance for Greece, Portugal and Turkey - continued build-up of Warsaw Pact force | Official text |
Final Communiqué23 May. 1983 of nuclear forces of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, the preparations of NATO's Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) missile deployments, and the state of arms control negotiations between the United-States and the Soviet Union on strategic nuclear forces | Official text |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Mr. J. Luns09 Dec. 1982 of international affairs. They desire to improve relations with the member states of the Warsaw Pact and to extend areas of co-operation to their mutual benefit. The Allies look to the Soviet leadership for tangible evidence that it shares their readiness | Official text |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Mr. J. Luns01 Dec. 1982 as a whole against the background of the continuing numerical superiority of Soviet conventional forces and the growing application of advanced technologies. Modernization and expansion of Warsaw Pact conventional forces continue to accelerate and include | Official text |
Final Communiqué30 Nov. 1982 and the Warsaw Pact, the preparations for NATO's Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) missile deployments and the status of negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union on strategic nuclear forces and on intermediate-range nuclear forces | Official text |
Declaration of the Heads of State and Government at the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Bonn, Germany10 Jun. 1982 the projection of military power on a global scale. While creating a threat of these dimensions, Warsaw Pact governments condemn Western defence efforts as aggressive. While they ban unilateral disarmament movements in their own countries they support demands | Official text |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Mr. J. Luns10 Dec. 1981 in preventing war, in the face of the Warsaw Pact's massive conventional and nuclear forces. The Alliance has to maintain a nuclear capability, since disarmament has not reached a satisfactory level. The Alliance could not reduce the risk of war by divesting | Official text |
Final Communiqué21 Oct. 1981 of nuclear forces of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, NATO's theatre nuclear force posture and progress in the implementation of the December 1979 two-track decision on long-range theatre nuclear force modernization and arms control. Ministers affirmed | Official text |
Final Communiqué24 May. 1981 developments in the nuclear forces of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, and the importance of keeping the public clearly aware of the basic principles of NATO nuclear policies. The principles on which the Western Alliance was founded remain as valid today as they were | Official text |
Final Communiqué13 May. 1981 , between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. In response to this continuing build-up in Soviet military strength, nations have achieved considerable improvements in the forces which they contribute to the Alliance. But the rate at which these have been achieved | Official text |
