| Title | Document type |
"NATO's transformation scorecard" by Robert G. Bell, senior vice president of SAIC01 Jan. 2005 , capabilities". But while the "lessons of Kosovo" were still being digested, NATO's strategic landscape was shaken by 9/11. The Alliance showed great agility and enduring respect for the principle of collective security in immediately invoking Article 5 | Opinion |
Video interview with Nicola de Santis, Coordinator for Mediterranean Dialogue and Istanbul Cooperation Initiative10 Dec. 2004 -Article 5 crisis response operations such as disaster relief, humanitarian relief, search and rescue, peace support operations; combating terrorism: including through effective intelligence sharing and maritime cooperation for example in the framework | Opinion |
Introductory remarks by NATO Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Schefferat the Signing ceremony and Exchange of letters on Russ...09 Dec. 2004 Endeavour. This operation, carried out under Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, aims to deter, defend against and disrupt terrorist activity through maritime operations in the Mediterranean. Russian support to the operation was agreed in principle by NRC | Opinion |
Russia to support NATO’s Mediterranean anti-terrorist operation09 Dec. 2004 Endeavour however is carried out under Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, and therefore a formal NATO collective defence operation. It is the first time that Russia contributes to such an operation. NATO and Russia have recently taken a number of measures | News |
Global NATO? Remarks by NATO Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Schefferat the Clingendael Institute29 Oct. 2004 invoked Article 5. In other words, Allies agreed that an attack by a terrorist "non-state actor" could trigger collective self-defence. That was a remarkable development in itself. And when it became clear that the threat had emanated from Afghanistan | Opinion |
''NATO after Istanbul'' - Speech by the NATO Secretary General in Helsinki, Finland09 Sep. 2004 Response Force. As you may know, this force is designed to cope with a broad spectrum of contingencies, including non-Article 5 contingencies. So I find it quite conceivable that a Partner country like Finland would conclude that participation in an NRF | Opinion |
"Expanding NATO’s counter-terrorism role" by C. Richard Nelson, Atlantic Council of the United States (ACUS)01 Jul. 2004 . Initial NATO responses For the first time in its history, NATO invoked Article 5 within 24 hours of the terrorist attacks against the United States on 11 September 2001. By 4 October 2001, in response to requests by the United States, Allies agreed | Opinion |
Statement by Wolfgang Schüssel, Federal Chancellor of Austria at the meeting of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council at the level of Heads of State and Government29 Jun. 2004 Brigade South West. We are pleased that the interests of Partners like Austria are well reflected in the document on the future of the Partnership which we are to endorse today. As troop contributor to several NATO-led non-Article 5 operations we attach | Opinion |
A more Ambitious and Expanded Framework for the Mediterranean Dialogue28 Jun. 2004 to NATO-led operations consistent with the UN Charter. These could include non-Article 5 crisis response operations such as disaster relief, humanitarian relief, search and rescue, peace support operations, and others as may subsequently be decided | Official text |
A more Ambitious and Expanded Framework for the Mediterranean Dialogue28 Jun. 2004 to NATO-led operations consistent with the UN Charter. These could include non-Article 5 crisis response operations such as disaster relief, humanitarian relief, search and rescue, peace support operations, and others as may subsequently be decided | Official text |
