| Title | Document type |
Joint Press Conference with the NATO Secretary General and the Minister of Defence of Ukraine14 Jun. 2007 that you've agreed upon into U.S. missile defence plans? How it actually affects NATO's missile defence plans? And could you spell out a bit more about what is meant by looking at the political and military implications of the U.S. missile defence plans | Opinion |
Press point by the NATO Secretary General14 Jun. 2007 hours ago in this room, is that we'll now, of course, see two tracks. We see the track United States... Poland, United States, Czech Republic on the U.S. third site and the timelines we discussed, and I gave you on the NATO side will run as much | Opinion |
Background briefing on the upcoming meeting of Defence Ministers by John Colston, Assistant Secretary General for Defence Planning and Policy11 Jun. 2007 of particular issues on which Ministers will want to concentrate. On missile defence we're hoping that they will take a specific decision that the future work on a possible future NATO missile defence system will take into account the implications of the U.S | Opinion |
Press briefing by NATO Spokesman James Appathurai06 Jun. 2007 : (inaudible)...the question's asked. Regarding the discussion with the Polish president, during the press conference he said that, sorry... he said that the... Poland would give an answer to the U.S. pretty soon, but it's a bilateral matter. Do you see eye | Opinion |
Press briefing by NATO Spokesman, James Appathurai23 May. 2007 shares that. That is why they both agree that there should be discussions within the Alliance on how to complement a possible U.S. system to ensure that there is courage, A, for all allies, and B against high, medium and low-range threats, missile | Opinion |
Joint press availability with NATO Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer and US President George W. Bush21 May. 2007 to rally around. The NATO mission in Afghanistan includes more than 15,000 U.S. troops, 21,000 troops from 36 other nations, including all our allies. That wouldn't be happening without your leadership. Together, with more than 100,000 Afghan security | Opinion |
Press briefing by NATO Spokesman, James Appathurai09 May. 2007 at the highest political level with the U.S. administration, which, of course, has a lead role in the coalition. So there should be no doubt that there is a mechanism, A, and B, constant communication to make sure we get it right. Q: James, you say | Opinion |
Press Conference (Q&A) by Jonas Gahr Støre, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Norway and NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer at the informal meeting of the North Atlantic Council at the level of Foreign Ministers26 Apr. 2007 , linking what should be, you know my opinion, a NATO discussion on preventing A and B category allies and on the basis of the indivisibility of security, what the consequences for NATO as a whole are, as an Alliance, of the U.S. third site discussion taking | Opinion |
News Conference by the Secretary General at the informal meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Foreign Ministerial Session26 Apr. 2007 , the decision-making in Riga in the sense that Heads of State and Government could not yet take into account the third U.S. site. It is clear that there is a full understanding between the allies that the plans in the framework of the third site cannot | Opinion |
News Conference (Q&A) by the Secretary General at the informal meeting of the NATO-Russia Council at the level of Foreign Ministers26 Apr. 2007 ask, in what way is the Russians' unilateral decision to suspend de facto its adhesion to the CFE Treaty different from the U.S.'s decision to abrogate the ABM Treaty several years ago. DE HOOP SCHEFFER: Well, this is a step taken by the Russians | Opinion |
