| Title | Document type |
"Big world, big future, big NATO" by Julian Lindley-French, senior scholar at the University of Munich01 Oct. 2005 and critical infrastructures that disruption could well be akin to destruction in future. Article-5, collective defence will continue to matter. However, like the Alliance itself, the treaty that created it must be interpreted as the basis for a dynamic defence | Opinion |
Press conference with the NATO Secretary General on the Extra-ordinary meeting of the North Atlantic Council08 Jul. 2005 are so dear to us all and which are the reason ofexistence for this Alliance, for NATO. Q (Lithuanian Radio and Television): Mr. Secretary General would there be any necessity of evoking Article 4 or Article 5 of the Treaty regarding the London | Opinion |
"Is it time to update NATO’s Strategic Concept?" by Lionel Ponsard & David S. Yost01 Jul. 2005 to it have reflected the need for NATO to adapt its plans and approaches to meet evolving challenges. The 1999 version reflected the adaptation of NATO’s strategies to what were then new post-Cold War circumstances. It maintained the Article 5 guarantee | Opinion |
"Crossing the Rubicon" by Ryan C. Hendrickson, associate professor of political science at Eastern Illinois University01 Jul. 2005 of overseeing a successful multinational military campaign and of using force to achieve non-Article 5 objectives, that is objectives other than collective defence. Under the terms of the Dayton Peace Agreement, NATO became involved in peacekeeping | Opinion |
"Growing pains" by Peter van Ham, director at the Institute of International Relations “Clingedael”01 Jul. 2005 Europe and North America. On the other, it seems that today no security challenge falls outside NATO’s remit. Since invoking its Article 5 collective-defence clause the day after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, NATO has arguably been evolving into what | Opinion |
"Combating terrorism" - Foreword by Christopher Bennett01 Jul. 2005 on NATO’s agenda. Indeed, just one day after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the Alliance invoked Article 5, its collective-defence clause, for the first time in its history. This issue of NATO Review, which is entitled Combating terrorism, examines | Opinion |
"NATO’s response to terrorism" by Dagmar de Mora-Figueroa, NATO's Defence Policy and Planning Division01 Jul. 2005 of the threat terrorism poses to our populations and forces. NATO’s reaction to the attacks on the United States was immediate and determined. Within 24 hours of the attacks, the Allies invoked Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, the collective-defence clause | Opinion |
NATO Review: 'Combating terrorism in the Mediterranean' - Article by Roberto Cesaretti, Commander of Operation Active Endeavour01 Jul. 2005 Article-5, collective-defence operation has evolved from a small-scale deployment providing a modest military presence in an important stretch of sea into a comprehensive, continuously adapting counter-terrorism operation throughout the Mediterranean | Opinion |
Panel 4 “Acting in concert in the Balkans and elsewhere – How can institutional cooperation make the world more secure?”25 May. 2005 in 2001 when NATO invoked Article 5. The fact is that it was the United States that suggested that NATO ought to go into Afghanistan. That was a US suggestion, Pierre. And the fact is that four months before the Iraq war we suggested that NATO go into Iraq | Opinion |
Press point by the Chairman of the NATO Military Committee after the meeting at Chief of Staff level12 May. 2005 never-happening defence situation—wecall Article 5 situation. It was time to plan for that extensively. Now we are an Alliance that is in operation. It's... we are... oursoldiers are close to the Chinese border. Actually, the Germansoldiers. So | Opinion |
