| Title | Document type |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Manfred Wörner28 Oct. 1988 <p>Review of security and defence matters - Role of nuclear weapons - <em>Warsaw</em> <em>Pact</em> superiority in conventional forces - Maintaining credibility of deterrent forces - Entry into force of INF Treaty - Status of US Strategic Modernisation Programme | Official text |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Lord Carrington27 May. 1988 conventional forces. There are disparities in several key areas between NATO and Warsaw Pact forces which continue to concern us . It is to mitigate this situation and to avoid undue reliance on the early use of nuclear weapons that we are determined to improve | Official text |
Conventional Arms Control: The Way Ahead03 May. 1988 situation in Europe. Thus the conventional imbalance in Europe remains at the core of Europe's security concerns. The problem is to a large extent a function of the Warsaw Pact's superiority in key conventional weapon systems. But it is not only a matter | Official text |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Lord Carrington28 Apr. 1988 into account our security requirements, arms control developments and the formidable array of capabilities deployed by the Warsaw Pact. We have confirmed that the forces remaining after the INF Treaty must be kept survivable, responsible and effective | Official text |
'Conventional Arms Control: The way ahead' - Statement issued under the Authority of the Heads of State and Government participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council02 Mar. 1988 security as well as our hopes for change in the political situation in Europe. Thus the conventional imbalance in Europe remains at the core of Europe's security concerns. The problem is to a large extent a function of the Warsaw Pact's superiority in key | Official text |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Lord Carrington11 Dec. 1987 of actual Soviet and Warsaw Pact conduct and of a sober calculation of the implications for our own security. Only in this way can the unnatural division of Europe be healed. As the Harmel Report states, the ultimate political purpose of our Alliance | Official text |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Lord Carrington02 Dec. 1987 accomplishment for the Alliance. At this meeting we focussed our attention on conventional forces where imbalances between NATO and the Warsaw Pact continue to concern us. We are determined to improve our conventional forces through the implementation | Official text |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Lord Carrington04 Nov. 1987 concerned about the offensive capabilities of the Warsaw Pact arrayed against us. We are therefore determined, consistent with the framework of the Montebello Decision and with our arms control obligations, to continue to implement those measures required | Official text |
Statement on the Ministerial Meeting of the North Atlantic Council11 Jun. 1987 desire to achieve a meaningful agreement which provides for reductions, limitations and effective verification, and call upon the Warsaw Pact participants in these talks to respond positively to the very important proposals made by the West in December | Official text |
Final Communiqué Chairman: Lord Carrington27 May. 1987 and offensive capabilities of the Warsaw Pact forces arrayed against the Alliance. Given this situation, NATO's strategy of flexible response and forward defence, which is defensive in nature, remain both valid and necessary and continues as the basis for NATO's | Official text |
