NATO
Logistics
Handbook
October 1997
|
Chapter 9: Production Logistics
Procedures for Armaments Cooperation
924. Armaments cooperation under the CNAD is
based essentially on an information exchange process which
seeks agreement between nations and the MNCs on
harmonized operational requirements in order to promote
cooperative equipment programmes. Because the responsibility for
equipping their forces is a prerogative of individual member nations,
this cooperative process can be supported and encouraged, but
not regulated, by NATO. There is therefore no formal or
centralized NATO armaments planning system. However, in order to
give greater coherence and structure to cooperative efforts, two
major Planning/programming systems have been introduced in
NATO: CAPS and the Phased Armaments Programming System (PAPS).
Armaments Planning: Conventional Armaments
Planning System (CAPS)
925. In 1988 the North Atlantic Council (NAC) approved
the establishment, under the auspices the CNAD, of a CAPS. It
was the result of a recommendation originally made by CNAD
to the Council in December 1985, as part of an
"Armaments Cooperation Improvement Strategy". The creation of the
CAPS reflected a growing realization at the time, of the need to
translate Alliance agreement on conventional defence improvements
into effective action by NATO's armaments community. But
no mechanism existed to achieve greater convergence
between Alliance military requirements, agreed "at
151", and co-operative armaments activities pursued "at 16" under the aegis of the CNAD. Further, the latter were too often conducted in a dispersed manner, without the benefit of an overarching
planning framework rooted in Alliance defence planning, and without
a view towards the longer term. Admittedly, the CNAD has
made earlier attempts at some form of planning, noticeably the
NATO Armaments Periodic Review (NAPR), but they were
unsuccessful and fell short of genuine Alliance armaments planning.
926. CAPS is characterized by:
- its aim to bridge the gap - conceptually as well
as procedurally - between defence planning,
oriented towards the satisfaction of Alliance military
requirements, and CNAD armaments activities focused, for the
most part, on the pursuit of armaments cooperation opportunities;
- the participation of France in Alliance
armaments planning; and
- the emphasis on the longer term.
927. The principal tasks of CAPS are:
- to provide guidance to the CNAD and orientation to
the nations on how the military needs of the Alliance can
best be met by national armaments programmes,
individually and collectively; and
- to help elaborate armaments cooperation
opportunities and priorities for the CNAD.
Armaments Programming: Phased Armaments
Programming System (PAPS)
928. PAPS is meant to be a tool available as required
for conducting programmes on a systematic basis and should not
be regarded as a set of formal and mandatory steps in
the implementation of CNAD projects. There is a finite and
fairly consistent number of milestones in the life of a weapon
system programme where the nature of the programme changes. At
these milestones, decisions must be made regarding alternative
courses of action. PAPS is intended to provide a structured approach
to decision-making at these milestones for all management
levels involved in cooperative research and development
and production programmes within NATO.
929. Milestones and Phases in the Life Cycle of
a Weapon System. The PAPS process begins when a nation or NMA
identifies a military mission deficiency, and a Mission Need Document
(MND) is transmitted to CNAD and the MC. Logistics support must be
taken into account early in order to ensure that maximum benefit can
be drawn from collaborative projects. The elements of logistics
support include manpower, financial and infrastructure requirements,
and requirements concerning availability, maintainability and
reliability including the estimated life cycle costs, all of which
contribute significantly to the concept evaluation and feasibility
assessments. The evolution of a typical programme is as follows:
- Milestone 1 - MND,
Phase 1 - Mission Need Evaluation
- Milestone 2 -
Outline NATO Staff Target (ONST), Phase
2 - Pre-Feasibility
- Milestone 3 -
NATO Staff Target (NST), Phase 3 -
Feasibility
- Milestone 4 -
NATO Staff Requirement (NSR), Phase 4
- Project Definition
- Milestone 5 -
NATO Design and Development Objective
(NADDO), Phase 5 -Design and Development
- Milestone 6 -
NATO Production Objective (NAPO), Phase
6 - Production
- Milestone 7 -
NATO In-Service Goals (NISEG), Phase
7 - In-Service
- Milestone 8 -
National Disengagement Intention (NADI),
Phase 8 - Disengagement
|