Ensuring compliance in Pale
by JO1(AW) Terk O. Husbands
First published in SFOR Informer #34, April 22, 1998
Pale-
While SFOR patrolling and maintaining a presence in Bosnia and Hercegovina
is important to the people of BiH in returning their country to its once
peaceful and prosperous state, SFOR, at times, needs to flex its muscles
when it comes to ensuring compliance with Annex 1A of the Dayton Peace
Agreement.
"In January of this year, it was decided a second Republika Srpska
Specialist Police unit be
brought under SFORs control in accordance with Annex1A," said
Canadian Major Jim Waddel, of CJ3s Co-ordination section. The unit
was the Security of Buildings Unit (SBU), who also provides VIP security
to government and visiting dignitaries.
The SBU fulfilled a very specialised role in providing security to government
facilities in Pale and Bijelina. "Once we received direction that
SFOR would receive a second unit under Annex 1A we went through the same
steps of ensuring compliance as we did with the first unit (Detachment
5 of the Doboj Specialist Police) back in August of 1997," continued
Waddel.
Ensuring compliance is primarily an administrative process. "In
August we issued an Instruction
To the Parties (ITP), which gave them direction on what we required,"
said Waddel. Administratively the ITP directed the Special Police Anti
Terrorist Brigade, an organisation of 750 Special Police Officers to include
inventories of weapons ammunition and equipment and rosters of all officers
belonging to the Special Police. Once everything was in order new ID cards
were issued to the Special Police and staged certification through the
International Police Task Force began for the Special Police Anti Terrorist
Brigade.
However,
unlike the first unit of special police to come under SFORs control
the SBU was not a para-military type unit and some issues in communications
arose prompting the compliance operation in Pale. "We came up against
resistance at the Minister of Interior level and things we anticipated
happening in bringing them under our control at the end of March did not
happen," said Waddel, pointing out that SFOR had expected a smoother
conclusion.
While negotiations were being conducted at high levels to settle the stand off,
communication broke down. "We thought we had a settlement but then the information
didnt seem to filter down through the proper RS channels," continued Waddel.
This
break down prompted compliance action operations on SFORs part.
"Basically we were forced to mount an operation to enforce compliance
with the ITP, which we had issued to them in February," stated Waddel.
"We went to Pale and spoke to the commander of the SBU and told him
he had two choices, he could comply and get his organisation administratively
in compliance with Annex 1A, immediately, or, we would decertify his organisation
in a similar way we did the office in Doboj last November," he continued.
Fortunately, SFOR authorities were already working with RS officials, "We were
already working with the SBU commanders superior, RS Chief of Police and the
Interior Minister. So when push came to shove, we insisted everything went smoothly and
they are now fully compliant, with a few minor details to be worked out," said
Waddel.
In order to show resolve during the operation in Pale, three companies from
Multinational Division South East, North and Central Brigade, were involved.
Should the SBU have refused to comply, SFOR would have gone to the SBU facilities and
confiscated all their weapons and equipment and we would have posted an SFOR presence at
the buildings the SBU was guarding. Fortunately, it didnt come to that and we
didnt have to settle for the second choice."
[Italian soldier]
[The work of SFOR]
|