Ten
years of Partnership and Cooperation - Partnership Today
Speech
by the State Secretary for Defence of Sweden,
Ms. Yvonne Gustafsson
Mr. Secretary General, Your Excellencies, Ladies and
Gentlemen:
It is a great honour for me to be here today giving this
presentation on the Theme Ten Years of Partnership and
Co-operation with focus on Civil Emergency Planning.
Since long way back, we have had a Total Defence concept
in Sweden. It means that the performance and capability
of our defence efforts rests on coordination and co-operation
between civilian and military resources. This is the cornerstone
of our Total Defence structure. It rests on two equal
pillars - one military and one civilian. Interpreted to
NATO vocabulary you could say that the civilian part corresponds
to what NATO calls civil emergency planning. Our civil
defence concept has developed through the last ten years,
with focus from a war orientation to a broadened focus
including preparedness for dealing also with severe peacetime
disturbances. I understand that NATO:s civil emergency
planning concept has developed in this direction as well.
Sweden is an active partner within the PfP and participate
in several areas of the co-operation. Swedish capability
to contribute to international peace and security co-operation
through the PfP is given high priority. This is also in
line with the Swedish Defence Resolution for 2002-2004,
which will be adopted by the Parliament in the autumn
of 2001. We consider PfP as an essential component of
European security cooperation. Sweden intends to play
a continued active role in promoting further enhancement
of this co-operation,.
I would like to stress the importance of developing a
continued active and deepened co-operation with NATO in
the civilian field. Sweden will participate and continue
its endeavour to deepen the civil PfP-co-operation. One
ambition is to further expand the level of interoperability.
Another is to identify specific areas for future co-operation.
Furthermore, Sweden believes that the PfP-cooperation
could form the basis for development of regional and bilateral
co-operation.
The PfP-activities within the civilian field should also
be considered important tools for contributing to developments
of the framework for EU crisis management - and vice versa.
Many of the countries in EAPC, who are not members of
the EU, have useful experiences within this field and
could give important contributions as regards civil crisis
management.
Both the EU and NATO comprise well-developed civilian
structures and extensive activities. Sweden believes that
co-operation between EU and NATO in the area which EU
calls civil aspects of crisis management and at NATO is
civil emergency planning, could enhance the overall effect.
The aim should be to develop a constructive, complementary
and effective co-operation.
The co-operation within the framework of PfP is for Sweden
a highly prioritised area. Sweden also finds it essential
to develop the civil area of PfP and we take an active
part in this development. We see the Euro-Atlantic Partnership
Council as a unique arena, which offers opportunities
for comprehensive discussions together with a large number
of countries. One important issue to discuss within the
EAPC is civil emergency planning and related areas. The
engagement in the ongoing discussions for the future direction
of the civil parts of the PfP and Partner countries involvement,
is therefore of essence.
The continued development of NATO:s concept for civil
emergency
planning should, in our opinion, to a large extent include
Partners nations. Four of five prioritised areas for civil
emergency planning are Partner-related. Partners should
therefore be actively involved in the development of all
these areas, except of course when the discussions have
a bearing on article five issues.
Many different activities have been organised in Sweden
as PfP or in the spirit of PfP activities. Examples of
such activities are courses, meetings and workshops. Sweden
organises for instance courses in the area of civil protection
and seminars have been held in the field of civil emergency
planning legislation and civil aspects of crisis management.
All these activities and active co-operation enhance
our common ability to
participate in international humanitarian and peace promoting
operations and
contributes to the creation of a European crisis management
capability. This
deepened and broadened co-operation also entails an increased
openness and
strengthened confidence within the PfP-family.
The continued development of the civilian PfP could include
deepened
operability in the co-operation and also the identification
of areas where
concrete co-operation could be established. The PfP also
provides an
opportunity for expanding bilateral and regional co-operation.
It is in our opinion also important to support the development
within the Senior Civil Emergency Planning Committee in
NATO. It is furthermore important to encourage civil -
military cooperation within the framework of civil emergency
planning.
Sweden has in different ways expressed its interest and
deep engagement in the civil emergency planning field
of PfP. Let me mention a few.
Sweden did second NATO:s Civil Emergency Planning Directorate
with a senior expert for more than two years. The expert
did serve as a senior member of the Directorate.
The establishment of the EADRCC was, when it was established
in 1998, another milestone in the civil PfP field. The
EADRCC is however, depending on secondments from nations.
Since the autumn 1998, Sweden has seconded the EADRCC
with civil experts and will continue to do so, at least
until June 2002.
These secondments have hopefully been of great value
for the development of the civil PfP-area but they have
had other values as well. Sweden has, on a national level,
taken advantage of the experience gained by these experts
and implemented the deepened knowledge they gained during
their service in NATO.
The civil Planning Boards and Committees were opened
for Partner participation in the spring 1997. Sweden has
since the beginning participated in the work of all these
committees and I dare say not only participated but very
actively participated. Furthermore, Sweden has hosted
many committee meetings and seminars. Swedish Agencies
and Authorities, which take an active part in the PfP
cooperation, have positive experiences from this work.
One reflection from this participation is that Partner
countries have much to offer and that the PfP participation
creates very useful networks. Another reflection is that
deepened insight in the CEP area of other countries and
their experiences, gives a valuable contribution when
we build up our own capability in dealing with different
kinds of crisis and disasters.
To conclude I will emphasise that Sweden will continue
to support the efforts to develop the civil emergency
planning concept within the EAPC area. Our aim is to further
develop the effective and constructive work that already
exists. The latest world events, has shown us the importance
of our combined ambitions of building confidence and security.

|