Header
Updated: 08-Jun-2001 NATO Speeches

EAPC Meeting
of Defence
Ministers
NATO HQ,
Brussels
8 June 2001

Statement

By Mr. Qirts Valdis Kristovskis,
Minister of Defence of the Republic of Latvia

Thank you Mr Chairman.

Dear Colleagues, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen!

It is a great pleasure for me to be here today and to address the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council of Defence Ministers session once again.

Secretary General, you have asked us in our interventions to cover the three items on today's agenda. To save time, I will focus on two.

But first let me thank the briefers for introducing these topics and in particular our friend Carl Bildt for his presentation.

Let me start with the current strategic environment, security risks and opportunities. Whilst the risks to security may have changed radically during the last decade, there is no doubt that new opportunities have presented themselves. The presence of forty six countries round this table is proof of that. The Alliances' Strategic Concept adopted two years ago addressed the challenges in the new environment. They may take a regional form based on ethnic and religious rivalries, as we have seen in the Balkans. Or they may be wider, such as the threats posed by the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery. Each set of challenges is addressed in its own way.

But as the last Strategic Concept recognises, enlargement of the Alliance is also a challenge which can serve the strategic interests of NATO. In this context, Latvia has greatly benefited from the MAP, PARP and other processes which have helped us with practical preparations to move closer.

Our own joint cooperation activities over the last years have also helped. They improve the strategic environment and show that we are reliable partners. Military and defence cooperation amongst the three Baltic countries has been a particularly successful instrument which offers added value to the Alliance.

Over the last year we have developed important cooperation amongst the nine NATO aspirants countries. In this context, just earlier this week Latvia hosted a meeting of Chiefs of Defence from the aspirant countries. It placed the accent on practical military cooperation and preparations that we are all undergoing with the Alliance. We looked at the experience of the last enlargement, issues of Host Nation Support for Article 5 operations and how Peace Support Operations impact on our National Planning system. We were pleased that our colleagues from outside the region were able to see at first hand how Baltic defence and military cooperation works.

Secretary General, colleagues,

A few words about the new PARP Ministerial Guidance. It reflects continuing and successful engagement in the PARP process. PARP has direct and important links with the Membership Action Plan. This relates particularly to the Partnership Goals. We have welcomed the opportunity to work on these goals. We realise that they are similar to the Force Goals that Allies consider amongst themselves. We have tried to take a realistic approach to dealing with Partnership Goals. Our experience shows that looking ahead, it would be helpful if the Partnership Goals could be better tailored to the individual needs of the partners concerned. The feedback mechanism within PARP has during this last year been very successful. We would welcome a continuation of this feedback and assessment during the coming year. I would especially like to thank the NATO Team for their committed work. It has been of great practical value to Latvia.

The PARP process helps us to focus on the need to improve our defence capabilities. It increases our interoperability. During the next year, I can assure you of Latvia's continued commitment to realistic improvements and reforms. These will be backed by resources given the recent law passed by Latvia's Parliament. This law fixes increases in defence spending to 1.75% and 2% of GDP for the next two years.

The PARP and related MAP process will no doubt have implications on the political decision on enlargement to be considered in Prague. Let me close by saying that by next year, Latvia will have engaged in both PARP and MAP processes to the fullest extent possible to make the political decision - making easier for Allies.

Thank you.

Go to Homepage Go to Index