Header
Updated: 14-May-2002 NATO Speeches

NATO HQ
8 June 2000

Statement to the Press

by Lord Robertson, NATO Secretary General,
following the Defence Ministers Meeting

When NATO's Defence Ministers met today they and I were very much aware that it was almost a year to the day since KFOR entered Kosovo, after our Alliance had successfully risen to the greatest challenge of its 50 year history. We did not meet in an atmosphere of self-congratulation, however, because this was very much a working meeting, building for the future not resting on our laurels.

All of us are determined to continue the process of adapting NATO to new challenges and new risks. After spending decades keeping the peace we are now shaping the future peace, but in very changed circumstances that means reshaping and modernising our forces.

The need for radical updating was clearly demonstrated by Kosovo, which has been both a success for NATO, and a pointer to further change. NATO's success has too often been overlooked by some, but a year on I look back on what we have achieved with pride.

We reversed the worst ethnic cleansing since World War 2, over a million refugees are now back home, and after a decade of discrimination Kosovar Albanians are now able to start rebuilding their lives and homes.

A formidable task remains, and the commitment we showed to win the air campaign a year ago must now be maintained over the long haul. Much of Kosovo is peaceful, but we know that tension lies just beneath the surface, and levels of violence are unacceptable.

That means keeping troop levels up, and for the international community to supply more police and judges, to help in the slow but steady restoration of law and order.

But it is clear from this Defence Ministerial meeting that we have the will to win the peace, and we also have the mandate. There are some who believe Resolution 1244, which mandates our presence, expires this weekend and that the Yugoslav troops are returning. They are wrong, 1244 stays effective unless the Security Council decides otherwise. For those who doubt our commitment to stay I point to Bosnia-Herzegovina, where SFOR continues its work as determined as when it first entered.

The Kosovo campaign was not just a success story for NATO - it was an alarm bell on our weaknesses - that alarm bell is still ringing. The United States carried far too much of the load and Europe has to shoulder more of the burden - something Europe has acknowledged openly.

The fact is our forces are still not properly adapted to today's threats and tomorrow's challenges. The Cold War may be dead and gone, but too many of our armies are structured to fight yesterday's battles. We simply do not have enough of the flexible, mobile forces needed for the new century.

However, we now have a roadmap for reform to our armed forces. With NATO's Defence Capabilities Initiative we have created a checklist for achieving these changes, and progress is being made. Several nations are bringing in the kind of radical reforms we need, new equipment is being ordered or developed in key areas such as strategic airlift and precision guided weapons.

All this is very encouraging, but no-one should fool themselves that reform and reprioritisation are enough on their own. Strong defence means two things for NATO's nations - spending wisely, but also spending enough. Europe in particular has to live up to its stated ambitions to play a stronger defence role.

After years of falling defence budgets the peace dividend has long since been paid. You cannot get defence on the cheap, and there can be no real security without resources.

This is a message I have being giving out to the nations over the last few months. I have already written to heads of state and government, reminding them of the commitments we all made at last year's Washington Summit. Today I made the position crystal clear for Defence Ministers and they accepted the challenge to do better.

I am determined to see NATO, which has already done so much, continue the evolution that will make it as important in the new century as it was in the last, and that's a view I found shared by my colleagues in today's meeting.

Go to Homepage Go to Index