Header
Updated: 9 December 1999 Speeches

EAPC Meeting
in Defense
Ministers
Session
3 Dec. 99

Intervention by

HE Juri Luik, Minister of Defence of the
Republic of Estonia

Secretary General, Excellencies,

Estonia follows, as closely as possible for a partner country, the ongoing developments in the Defence Capabilities Initiative - not because of intellectual curiosity but because the DCI is defining the alliance we will join. By bolstering alliance's effectiveness DCI will ensure NATO's position as a centrepiece of Europe's security. In that respect we welcome the Operational Capabilities Concept which translates the basic tenets of the DCI to the partnership. OCC is a good basis for carrying the work forward in ensuring a smooth future NATO-led PSO if one might come up. Decade-long turmoil in parts of the former Yugoslavia reminds us that it might.

Another initiative stemming from the Washington Summit is of particular relevance for Estonia - the Membership Action Plan (MAP). Estonia has made a political decision to be ready for the next round of NATO enlargement. The ANP is the most extensive and comprehensive defence-related planning document approved by the Estonian government so far. MAP gave us an impetus to review our plans in the entire field of security and defence and has consolidated co-operation among various governmental departments involved.

In the light of our aspirations I would highlight here a political decision of the Government supported by majority of political forces to allocate appropriate resources to defence issues. Estonian Government is committed to fulfil the responsibilities it has taken upon itself to increase the defence expenses to 2% of the GDP by the year 2002. In accordance with the State budget draft bill already submitted by the Government to Parliament, the defence expenses for next year will be 1.6 percent of the GDP compared to this year's 1.39 percent. If to talk about the allocations of defence budget, then Estonia is in a privileged situation for not having to spend enormous sums on the maintenance of old infrastructure or conversion of defence industry.

As I already slipped into money-talk, one might pose a question: where is the return for the investment the alliance members have put into the partner countries, in other words - where is the partnership for peace dividend? The most obvious answer is simple - on the ground in Bosnia & Herzegovina and in Kosovo. Estonia's contributions to SFOR and KFOR, though relatively small in real numbers, is quite substantial in per capita terms. It demonstrates that small countries are able and willing to give their fair share to our common cause - a stable and secure Europe.

Those initiatives, policies and actions are paving the way for the political decision of enlargement. Estonia welcomes that we are provided with a mechanism to use the time in alliance's antechamber efficiently.

Thank you

Go to Homepage Go to Index