Press
Release
(2002)071
6 June 2002
|
Final
Communiqué
Ministerial
Meeting of the Defence Planning Committee and the Nuclear Planning
Group held in Brussels on 6 June 2002
- The Defence Planning Committee and Nuclear Planning Group
of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization met in Ministerial
Session in Brussels on 6 June 2002.
- We reaffirmed our determination that, to carry out the
full range of its missions, NATO must be able to field forces
that can move quickly to wherever they are needed, sustain
operations over distance and time, and achieve their objectives.
In this context, we adopted a new set of NATO Force Goals
covering the period until 2008. We welcomed the decision by
Iceland to participate in the Force Goal process for the first
time.
- To ensure that the Alliance has the structures and deployable
forces capable of fulfilling its fundamental security tasks
in a changing strategic environment, including responding
to the threats posed by terrorism and the proliferation of
Weapons of Mass Destruction, there is a need to look again
at the Alliance's overall command and control structures.
Towards this end, there is an urgent need to take forward
and build upon the ongoing assessment of the Alliance's overall
command arrangements. The implications of the changing strategic
circumstances, and the associated risks and potential threats,
for NATO's ability to fulfil the full range of its missions
must be fully taken into account in the course of this work.
This review must be comprehensive, embracing all elements
of NATO's command structure, including the Combined Joint
Task Force Headquarters, and the headquarters of the NATO
force structure, with the aim of defining the minimum military
requirements. Therefore, today we directed the NATO Military
Authorities to take forward this work with urgency and report
back to us at our meeting in September to enable us to give
further guidance for the preparation of specific recommendations
for decisions to be taken at the Prague Summit. Our intention
is that the Heads of State and Government at Prague should
establish clear guidance and a firm timeframe for completing
this work, so that decisions on command arrangements can be
taken by the Summer of 2003.
- In considering Force Goals 2002, we noted in particular
that they address to a large extent military capabilities
needed to respond to terrorism. We also considered how far
they address the key areas for improvement identified in the
Defence Capabilities Initiative. The Force Goals continue
to focus on the development of better-equipped, deployable,
sustainable forces and their restructuring. They also incorporate,
to a large extent, requirements derived from the review of
the NATO force structure which has been undertaken by NATO's
military authorities and which aims at the development of
more deployable forces. In the light of the changing strategic
environment, while the overall requirement for land combat
forces has declined, the requirement for ground combat forces
that are deployable has more than doubled.
- We therefore recognise that the ability of the Alliance
to fulfil its missions in the current strategic environment
depends on our ability to increase substantially the proportion
of our combat forces and support forces that can be deployed
on operations away from home territory or without substantial
host nation support. This is a significant challenge and we
are committed to meet it. On the basis of discussions on the
development of the Force Goals, it is clear that more effort
needs to be focussed on the development of key capabilities
including defence against nuclear, chemical and biological
weapons, strategic transport, support capabilities for combat
units and a number of specialised capabilities such as surveillance
and target acquisition, support jamming and air-to-air refuelling.
We noted that reprioritisation, multinational cooperation
and role sharing, including where appropriate by means of
joint or common funding or through commonly-owned and operated
NATO systems such as AWACS, will have an important role to
play in overcoming these deficiencies. To facilitate such
common programmes, we intend to devote particular attention
to efficient ways of managing collaborative projects and coordinating
defence acquisition. However, in many cases additional financial
resources will also be required. We undertake to give a high
priority in our national defence plans to implementation of
the 2002 NATO Force Goals and to seek the necessary resources
to ensure this.
- At our Nuclear Planning Group meeting, we reviewed the
status of NATO's nuclear forces and addressed related issues
and activities. We received with appreciation information
by the United States Secretary of Defense on the results of
the recent Summit meeting between Presidents Putin and Bush
at Moscow and St. Petersburg, particularly with regard to
the further development of the New Strategic Framework between
the United States and Russia. We welcomed the results of the
Summit and expressed our full support for its agreement on
a Treaty to reduce, over the next decade, U.S. operationally
deployed strategic nuclear warheads to a level of between
1,700 and 2,200 and to reduce Russian strategic nuclear warheads
to the same level.
- We recalled that NATO's sub-strategic nuclear forces have
been reduced by over 85 percent since 1991, and are maintained
at the minimum level sufficient to preserve peace and stability.
In this context, we provided guidance to further adapt NATO's
dual-capable aircraft posture. We reaffirmed that the fundamental
purpose of the nuclear forces of the Allies is political:
to preserve peace and prevent coercion and any kind of war.
We continue to place great value on the nuclear forces based
in Europe and committed to NATO, which provide essential political
and military linkage between the European and the North American
members of the Alliance.
- In this regard, we note that deterrence and defence, along
with arms control and non-proliferation, will continue to
play a major role in the achievement of the Alliance's security
objectives. We reaffirmed our determination to contribute
to the implementation of the conclusions of the 2000 Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference and welcomed the
full discussion of issues at the Preparatory Conference for
the 2005 Review Conference in April this year. We continue
to support the existing moratoria on nuclear testing.
- We expressed satisfaction with the results of the Joint
Seminar of NATO and Russian nuclear experts, held at The Hague
in April 2002, to deal with topics of nuclear safety and security.
The Seminar represented the first step in further advancing
consultations and cooperation on NATO proposals for confidence
and security building measures to enhance transparency between
the two sides on nuclear weapons issues. In this context,
we welcomed the additional impetus and focus provided by the
results of the Putin-Bush Summit for this work.

|