Press
Release
M-NAC-
D(99)156
2 Dec. 1999
|
Final
Communiqué
Meeting
of the North Atlantic Council
in Defence Ministers Session held in Brussels
- The North Atlantic Council met in Defence Ministers Session in Brussels
on 2 December, 1999.
- As this was our first formal meeting following the Washington Summit
and Operation ALLIED FORCE, our discussions centred on assessing progress
on the continuing adaptation of the Alliance as directed by the Heads
of State and Government in the Summit Communiqué
and in the new Strategic Concept, and on
reviewing the situation in the Balkans.
- Against the background of political developments in the region, we
reviewed the status of NATO's comprehensive approach and continuing
commitment to the promotion of security, stability, democracy, and the
peaceful resolution of disputes in the Balkans, including the NATO-led
operations for Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo, and the implementation
of the South East Europe Initiative. As Defence Ministers, we welcome
the fact that the NATO military authorities continue to monitor the
situation across the region closely.
- The conclusion of the Kosovo air campaign marked the achievement
of the key objectives of the NATO Allies and their partners. The humanitarian
catastrophe has ended; an international peace force (KFOR) has been
successfully deployed; and the international community has assumed responsibility
for the civil administration through UNMIK. The key to success was the
cohesion of the Alliance. NATO has remained united and resolute throughout.
- Considerable progress has been made since the completion of the air
campaign. We are determined to play our part in meeting in full the
aims of the international community as set out in UNSCR
1244.
- Ethnically motivated violence must stop. While the security situation
in Kosovo is relatively stable, continued diligence is required in an
environment which is still tense and uncertain. We will not tolerate
harassment against minorities or the development of parallel structures
that threaten UNMIK or KFOR objectives or the rule of law. We note with
satisfaction that the ICTY prosecutor expressed appreciation for the
support provided by KFOR. KFOR forces are now at full strength. We confirm
that KFOR remains alert to, and capable of responding to, any external
threat to the security of Kosovo, and strongly endorse KFOR's commitment
to monitoring and providing security at borders and internal boundaries.
KFOR will continue to provide a secure environment for all the inhabitants
of Kosovo. We commend KFOR in particular for their work in protecting
all minorities, including through maintaining an effective military
presence in Serb minority areas. We welcome the successful completion
of the demilitarisation of the KLA, and KFOR's efforts to combat illegal
arms and intimidation from whatever quarter. We support KFOR's contribution
to the establishment of the Kosovo Protection Corps, as a multi-ethnic
and civil organisation. This was a vital step in giving to former combatants
a perspective for integration into civilian life after the demilitarisation
of the KLA.
- We are pleased with the excellent co-operation between KFOR and UNMIK.
We reaffirm our full support to UNMIK in its efforts to establish a
fully functioning civil administration in Kosovo. We commend the UN
Secretary General's Special Representative for his outstanding efforts
to this end. It will be vital that UNMIK is adequately resourced if
it is to complete its mission successfully.
- The robust practical and political support which neighbouring countries
provided throughout the air campaign, and which they continue to provide,
was and remains critical to success. We noted our deep appreciation
for this support and in particular welcome the ongoing efforts of Albania
and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (1)
in supporting KFOR. NATO will continue to work closely with the countries
of the region to build long-term and sustainable regional stability.
In this context, we noted the Alliance's continuing work to develop
the South East Europe Initiative to promote regional security and co-operation
in the region, including through Partnership for Peace tools, the Euro-Atlantic
Partnership Council, and the Consultative Forum. The South East Europe
Initiative supports and complements the objectives of the Stability
Pact for South East Europe. Implementation of activities under the initiative
has already begun, including efforts both at NATO Headquarters and in
the countries themselves to harmonise assistance programmes. We look
forward in this regard to the establishment by the countries concerned,
with the support of Allies, of a Security Assistance Co-operation Group
and speedy implementation of other measures to increase the effectiveness
of such assistance and to promote regional co-operation and transparency
on security issues. We welcome the ideas already put forward by countries
in the region in this respect, and the existing co-operation mechanisms
they have established, and encourage them to make progress on activities
such as the proposed exchange of representatives among national military
headquarters and government ministries. We directed the Council in Permanent
Session to report progress in all these areas at our next meeting.
- We welcomed the progress that has been achieved in Bosnia-Herzegovina
including the development of civil institutions; increases in the level
of refugee returns, including to minority areas; progress in civil reconstruction;
reductions in arms holdings; and the development of the role of the
Standing Committee on Military Matters. We commended SFOR's role in
this process, which has permitted a substantial restructuring of the
force, including a reduction by about a third of the current strength
which should be complete early next year. We are confident that it will
result in a more flexible force capable of contributing fully to the
maintenance of a secure environment in support of the full implementation
of the Dayton Peace Agreement.
We endorsed SFOR's close working relationship with the High Representative
and other civil agencies in Bosnia-Herzegovina, and in particular SFOR's
continuing strong support for the work of the International Criminal
Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia, including through the continuing successful
detention of persons indicted for war crimes. At the same time we realise
that more needs to be done and we are committed to ensuring that progress
continues, including through further detentions, and attach priority
to the campaign against corruption, to continuing refugee returns, and
to further reductions in arms, force levels and military budgets. We
commend the High Representative's efforts and fully support his initiative
gradually to shift responsibility to the people of Bosnia-Herzegovina
for their own internal affairs. We support his recent decision to remove
from office various public officials who have obstructed the implementation
of the Dayton accords.
- We are concerned about the lack of progress towards a democratic
and peaceful FRY taking its place in the international community, which
remains our goal. We are also concerned about the tensions between Serbia
and Montenegro and urge all concerned to refrain from any destabilising
measures.
- We are grateful for the very substantial contribution that NATO's
Partners, including Russia and Ukraine, and other nations are making
to efforts to bring peace and stability to the Balkans. We expressed
our deepest appreciation for the outstanding skill, courage and determination
with which the service men and women of all nations are undertaking
their duties in both SFOR and KFOR, as well as during the air campaign.
- We are determined to draw on our experience during the Kosovo conflict
to prepare ourselves better for any such contingencies in the future,
and to continue building a more effective Alliance. The campaign underlined
the importance of planning for a wide range of possible contingencies
and the need for determination in the conduct of operations. It demonstrated
the need to enhance the capabilities of Allies' military forces - and
particularly the forces of European Allies - to engage more effectively
in the most complex aspects of modern peace support operations, and
to improve their readiness and availability to deploy forces at short
notice.
- We remain deeply concerned about the situation in the North Caucasus.
Recognising Russia's territorial integrity and Russia's right to protect
itself against terrorism, we urge Russia to exercise the fullest restraint,
cease the disproportionate and indiscriminate use of force which has
given rise to severe hardship for the civilian population, and take
urgent steps towards a political solution building on the commitments
of Istanbul and the role of the OSCE. We call upon Russia to facilitate
the provision of humanitarian relief to those in need and to work co-operatively
with international organisations. Finally, we urge Russia to ensure
that the conflict does not spread to other states, bearing in mind the
importance of regional stability and security.
- Responding to the new demands of the approach to Alliance security
set out in the new Strategic Concept, the Defence
Capabilities Initiative agreed in Washington will ensure that the
Alliance's forces can deploy quickly, can be supplied, reinforced and
sustained for an extended period away from their home bases, and can
operate more effectively, be better protected, and be supported by effective
command and control arrangements. Drawing on the lessons learned from
Alliance operations in the Balkans, the Defence Capabilities Initiative
will promote greater interoperability among Alliance forces and, where
applicable, also between Alliance and Partner forces. The Initiative
will also strengthen European capabilities and the European pillar of
NATO. Implementing the Defence Capabilities Initiative will require
a sustained effort by Allies as well as by NATO bodies to focus their
efforts on the important capability areas identified by the Initiative,
to ensure force structures are properly balanced to meet anticipated
requirements, to pursue creative approaches to overcoming shortfalls
in capabilities, and to provide sufficient resources to meet the challenges
of the future. Implementation of DCI is first and foremost a national
responsibility. However, co-operative and collective arrangements and
mechanisms, including multi-national, joint and common funding, will
also have to make an important contribution.
- We have reviewed the state of implementation of DCI. We are encouraged
by the useful initial results achieved to date, both within NATO and
in national programmes. We are pleased with the progress in implementing
the Multi-national Joint Logistic Centre Concept including in the staffing
of the MJLC positions and the refinement of its new operational doctrine.
We also noted ongoing work to develop clearinghouse mechanisms on multi-national
formations on which a first conference will take place later this month,
and the acceleration of work to develop a system architecture for NATO
Consultation, Command and Control. In order to continue this initial
progress, we directed that further vigorous efforts to implement DCI
be undertaken and have asked for a progress report at our next meeting.
- Work on the development of the European Security and Defence Identity
within the Alliance continues as set out in the Washington Summit Communiqué
and the Strategic Concept. In this context, an initial exchange of views
has taken place on the question of relations with the European Union,
on the practical arrangements for supporting EU-led operations, and
on the participation issue.
- We applaud the determination of all European Allies to take the necessary
steps to strengthen European military capabilities. These improvements
will both strengthen the ability of Allies to contribute to Alliance
missions, and will also contribute to strengthening the capability for
EU-led operations. We are following closely ongoing work in the EU and
are looking forward to EU initiatives which may emerge from the Helsinki
Summit, notably in relation to the development of defence capabilities
avoiding unnecessary duplication, expecting that these initiatives and
those arising from NATO's DCI will be mutually reinforcing, and in the
confidence that a stronger Europe means a stronger Alliance. On this
basis, we look forward to building a close relationship between NATO
and the European Union.
- Meanwhile, the Alliance continues to work with the WEU to complete
and implement arrangements to facilitate co-operation between the two
organisations in the event of a WEU-led military operation using NATO
assets and capabilities. We look forward to exercising these arrangements
in a crisis management exercise between NATO and the WEU scheduled for
February 2000. We appreciate the information we have received on the
outcome of the WEU Audit of assets and capabilities available for Petersberg
tasks as approved by WEU Ministers at their Luxembourg
meeting.
- We underline the risk to international and regional stability posed
by the spread of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.
The principal non-proliferation goal of the Alliance and its members
is to prevent proliferation from occurring, or, should it occur, to
reverse it through diplomatic means. We urge all countries to accede
to and fully implement the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the cornerstone
of the non-proliferation regime. We are determined to achieve progress
on a legally binding protocol including effective verification measures
to enhance compliance and promote transparency that strengthens the
implementation of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention. We emphasise
the importance of universal accession and adherence to the Chemical
Weapons Convention.
- The Alliance is making progress in implementing the Weapons of Mass
Destruction Initiative (WMDI). The new Weapons of Mass Destruction Centre
will improve co-ordination of all WMD-related activities at NATO Headquarters,
as well as strengthen non-proliferation related political consultations
and defence efforts to improve the preparedness of the Alliance. We
look forward to establishing the WMD Centre in early 2000. Significant
progress has been made in defining the tasks of the WMD Centre. The
specifications of a WMD intelligence and information database are under
active consideration, with the aim of improving the quality and increasing
the quantity of intelligence and information-sharing among Allies. Finally,
we are continuing to prepare for renewed consultations with Russia under
the Permanent Joint Council on these matters, and we welcome the initiation
of proliferation-related discussions with Ukraine in the NATO-Ukraine
Commission. We are determined to improve our capabilities to address
appropriately and effectively the risks associated with the proliferation
of weapons of mass destruction and their delivery means, which also
pose a potential threat to the Allies' populations, territory and forces.
- Work also continued on other aspects of NATO's internal adaptation.
The activation of the headquarters of the new command structure began
on 1 September. The new command structure will provide the Alliance
with the capacity to command and control the full range of the Alliance's
military missions, including through the use of deployable combined
and joint headquarters, in particular CJTF headquarters. The final phase
of the implementation of the Combined Joint Task Force Concept, which
has begun, will provide the Alliance with an important new tool for
crisis management in the next century. In addition, NATO's military
authorities are preparing guidance on the military implementation of
the Strategic Concept. It will be followed by a review of the force
structure which will lead to a more effective response to future risks
and threats. In parallel, NATO's military authorities are updating NATO's
operational planning procedures, adapting them in order to take into
account the lessons learned from the recent operations and more generally
to respond to operational requirements.
- We reaffirm that NATO remains open to new members under Article
10 of the Washington Treaty. The Alliance expects to extend further
invitations in coming years to nations willing and able to assume the
responsibilities and obligations of membership, and as NATO determines
that the inclusion of these nations would serve the overall political
and strategic interests of the Alliance and the inclusion would enhance
overall European security and stability. We welcome the considerable
interest and active participation by aspirant countries in the Membership
Action Plan, including its defence and military aspects. They have submitted
Annual National Programmes, which establish a basis for taking the MAP
process forward, including through Alliance assessment and feedback
on their progress towards strengthening their ability to meet the requirements
and obligations of membership. Preparation for possible future membership
is supported by Partnership for Peace activities. Tailored Individual
Partnership Programmes and Partnership Goals for aspirants will be of
key importance in support of improving the effectiveness and interoperability
of their armed forces. We will consider progress by each aspirant in
the defence and military field at our next Ministerial meeting.
- We welcomed the decision of Ireland to become, as of 1 December 1999,
the newest member of the Partnership for Peace. This testifies to the
central role PfP has come to play in Euro-Atlantic security and stability.
- We appreciate the progress being made in implementing the Enhanced
and more Operational Partnership, which was launched at the Washington
Summit to reinforce the operational capability of Partnership for Peace.
We look forward to the approval tomorrow of the first Ministerial Guidance
of the PfP Planning and Review Process (PARP) and the development of
Partnership Goals as a substantial step forward in bringing the force
planning process for Partners closer to that of the Alliance and achieving
enhanced capabilities.
- We welcome the progress that has been made in involving Partners
as troop contributing nations in consultations, planning, conduct and
political oversight of the present operations in the Balkans, in accordance
with the Political-Military Framework (PMF) for NATO-led PfP operations.
We endorse the Operational Capabilities Concept which will reinforce
PfP's operational capabilities and improve the capability and interoperability
of Partner forces, as well as enhance the Alliance's overall ability
to put together tailored force packages to mount and sustain future
NATO-led PfP operations along the lines of SFOR and KFOR. The Operational
Capabilities Concept will evolve to reflect further development and
implementation of the concept in light of new challenges to multinational
operations involving both Allies and Partners. We appreciate the substantial
progress achieved so far on the Training and Education Enhancement Programme
and look forward to the submission of the fully developed programme
at our next meeting in Spring 2000. We have tasked the Council in Permanent
Session to report progress on these important initiatives at our Spring
2000 meeting.
- We continue to attach great importance to a close relationship with
Russia as envisaged in the NATO-Russia
Founding Act. In addition to our joint efforts in Bosnia-Herzegovina,
there has been excellent co-operation between NATO and Russian forces
in Kosovo, and we have continued to consult regarding Kosovo in the
Permanent Joint Council. We regret that Russia has not yet been willing
to resume the full spectrum of co-operation agreed in the Founding Act.
We urge Russia to reconsider her policy in this respect and look forward
to expanding our consultations and co-operation in the future, including
in the framework of the EAPC and the Partnership for Peace.
- We attach great importance to the further development of our distinctive
partnership with Ukraine. We pledge our continued support for the Joint
Working Group on Defence Reform and note the valuable work of the NATO
Liaison Office and of the Documentation and Information Centre in Kyiv.
We look forward to the meeting tomorrow of the NATO-Ukraine Commission.
- The Mediterranean is an area of special interest to the Alliance.
We are pleased with the progress achieved in enhancing the Mediterranean
Dialogue as part of the Alliance's co-operative approach to security.
We welcome the fact that the 2000 Work Programme will include a substantial
number of military activities. We also emphasise the importance of tailored
defence-related activities, and, in this context, of military contacts
through visits to Mediterranean Dialogue countries. To this end we direct
the Council in Permanent Session to submit a progress report to us on
these issues at our next meeting.
- The Agreement on the Adaptation of the Treaty on Conventional Armed
Forces in Europe, signed at the OSCE Summit in Istanbul on 19 November,
will ensure the continuing viability of the CFE Treaty as a cornerstone
of European security and stability. The Allies made comprehensive proposals
which served as an important basis for the negotiations, in particular
for the introduction of a system of nationally based equipment limits
and improvements to the Treaty provisions concerning stability, transparency
and predictability. The Adapted Treaty will enhance security throughout
Europe, not least as it introduces a more constraining structure of
National and Territorial Ceilings, while permitting sufficient deployment
flexibility for routine training purposes and effective crisis management,
thereby ensuring NATO's ability to fulfil its responsibilities. We are
pleased that the Adapted Treaty will permit accession by new States
Parties and strengthen Treaty requirements concerning host nation consent
to the presence of foreign forces.
- We welcome the important political commitments contained in the CFE
Final Act, in particular the bilateral agreements reached by Russia
and Georgia, and Russia and Moldova, on withdrawal of Russian Forces.
But it is essential that the CFE Treaty remains effective and credible.
NATO countries are concerned about continued Russian non-compliance
with the Treaty's Article V ("flank") limits. We note Russia's
commitment to comply with all the Treaty's provisions and limitations.
We also note Russia's assurances that its exceeding of CFE limits will
be of a temporary nature. NATO Allies expect Russia to honour its pledge
to comply with CFE limits as soon as possible and, in the meantime,
to provide maximum transparency regarding its forces and weapons deployed
in the North Caucasus, in accordance with the CFE Treaty and the Vienna
Document. Entry into force of the Adapted Treaty can only be envisaged
in the context of compliance by all States Parties with the Treaty's
limitations. It is on this basis that we will work towards bringing
the Adapted Treaty into force. Pending the completion of this process,
the continued implementation of the existing Treaty and its associated
documents remains crucial.
- The Alliance attaches importance to preserving strategic stability.
In this respect, we call on Russia to ratify the START II Treaty without
delay. This would pave the way for considerable reductions of nuclear
arsenals and would allow negotiations on a START III Treaty aiming at
further far-reaching reductions on nuclear weapons stockpiles. We remain
committed to an early entry into force of the Comprehensive Test Ban
Treaty and call upon all countries to accede to and implement the Treaty
as soon as possible. We support the early conclusion of a Fissile Material
Cut-off Treaty.
- We welcomed the completion of the NATO Armaments Review conducted
under the auspices of the Conference of National Armaments Directors
(CNAD). The Review sets out new arrangements for the harmonisation of
armaments-related requirements to meet Alliance defence capability needs,
the standardisation of materiel in pursuit of broad-based interoperability,
co-operative equipment procurement and a more effective use of defence
research and technology resources. A key result of the Review will be
to enhance co-ordination particularly through the NATO Committee for
Armaments Co-ordination of materiel-oriented matters among all NATO
bodies concerned and thereby contribute directly to the implementation
of the Defence Capabilities Initiative. A NATO Research and Technology
Strategy has been developed to guide the work of the Alliance in this
field. Both the Review and the Strategy will help sustain NATO's distinct
role in the field of armaments in the years ahead. We welcome the developments
within the European defence industry and their contribution to the strengthening
of the European capabilities. Viable defence industries on both sides
of the Atlantic are critical to the efficient functioning of NATO military
forces. To that end, we welcome continued transatlantic defence industrial
co-operation to help ensure interoperability, economies of scale, competition
and innovation. In this context, we look forward to an increase in transatlantic
co-operation in the field of research, development and production of
armaments in a spirit of balance and partnership as an important factor
of the cohesion of the Alliance.
- In order to enhance the effectiveness of Civil-Military Co-operation,
confirmed in the Strategic Concept as essential to the Alliance's operational
capability, a fundamental review of civil emergency planning in NATO
is nearing completion. This review will result in a closer working relationship
between the civil and military communities and will permit a more effective
use of civil resources in such Alliance activities as peace support
operations. The important contribution of Partners to joint operations
will also benefit from the outcome of the review as they become more
and more involved in civil-military planning activity. In this regard,
Partners' growing involvement in CEP activities which, in addition to
their interoperability in disaster response through the Euro-Atlantic
Disaster Relief Co-ordination Centre, now also includes arrangements
for civil support to the military, is proving highly useful.
- NATO common funding plays a significant role in support of the NATO
command structure in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo. As part of the continued
adaptation of the common funded programmes to Alliance security requirements
as set out in the new Strategic Concept, steps have been taken to improve
their transparency and the focusing of the common-funded resource allocation
process. We welcome the initiatives set out to further improve this
process.
- Terrorism in all its forms constitutes a serious threat to peace,
security and stability that can threaten the territorial integrity of
states. We reiterate our condemnation of terrorism and reaffirm our
determination to combat it in accordance with our international commitments
and national legislation. The terrorist threat against deployed NATO
forces and NATO installations requires the consideration and development
of appropriate measures for their continued protection, taking full
account of host nation responsibilities.
Footnote:
- Turkey recognises the Republic of
Macedonia with its constitutional name.
|