Defence
Planning
Committee
NATO HQ,
Brussels
11 Dec. 1992
|
Final Communiqu
- The Defence Planning Committee of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization met in Ministerial session in Brussels on 10 and 11
December 1992.
- We are at a critical period in the transformation of Europe.
Our meeting has built on the decisions taken at the NATO Summits
in London and Rome; at Maastricht, and at the CSCE Helsinki Summit. At our recent meeting at Gleneagles, we expressed our
deep concern about the risks to European security and stability
posed by the growth of regional conflicts involving ethnic
rivalries and territorial disputes. The Alliance remains
committed to play a full part in seeking the peaceful resolution
of these conflicts, thus bringing to an end the loss of life,
suffering and destruction involved.
- The most acute crisis is the war in the former Yugoslavia.
We fully support the efforts of the United Nations, the CSCE and
the European Community to find a negotiated settlement to this
tragic conflict and call on all parties to cooperate with these
efforts. The Allies are making substantial practical
contributions to the peacekeeping efforts of the United Nations,
including ceasefire monitoring and participation in and the
protection of humanitarian relief convoys. NATO has increased
its involvement in recent weeks: it is providing important
elements of the operational headquarters of the United Nations
Protection Force in Bosnia-Hercegovina as well as undertaking air
monitoring operations and, in cooperation with the WEU, maritime
enforcement actions in support of UN Security Council
Resolutions. The Alliance has made clear its willingness to
consider positively further requests for assistance from the
United Nations.
- NATO possesses unique capabilities to contribute to
peacekeeping operations. We, as Defence Ministers, have an
important role to play in developing NATO's ability to support
such operations in response to requests from the UN or CSCE. An
Alliance commitment to peacekeeping, either by the use of
collective assets, or in the context of individual national
contributions to peacekeeping missions, has implications for
NATO's defence planning. It will be important to ensure that
individual national contributions to peacekeeping operations are
consistent with the Alliance's collective defence
responsibilities and capabilities. Recognising that decisions to
support peacekeeping activities will have to be taken on a case
by case basis and in accordance with Alliance procedures, we need
to ensure that the necessary capabilities are refined and are
available if and when such decisions are made. NATO's Military
Authorities have already begun to prepare the basis necessary for
possible future NATO support to peacekeeping activities. To
complement this work, and consistent with the political decision
taken by the Council in Oslo on Alliance support of peacekeeping,
we have tasked the DPC in permanent session to identify specific
measures in such areas as command and control, logistic support,
infrastructure, and training and exercises which will enhance
NATO's peacekeeping capabilities and which can be refined through
the force planning process. We have concluded that support for
UN and CSCE peacekeeping should be included among the missions of
NATO forces and headquarters. We believe that planning and
preparations in this area should be undertaken as far as possible
with the close involvement of all Allies.
- The spread of crisis and conflict in Europe has made
dialogue and cooperation even more important.Defence-related
activities with our cooperation partners are making a valuable
contribution to improving the overall security environment.
Frequent discussions are taking place at all levels between
Alliance officials and military officers and our partners.
Successful high-level seminars have been held on Defence Policy
and Management, and the Organisation and Structure of Defence
Staffs and Armed Forces in Democratic Societies. A further
seminar on Defence and the Environment will be held early next
year in the Netherlands. Representatives of most partner
countries have attended special courses arranged at NATO
institutions.A considerable proportion of our defence-related
cooperation effort involves the provision of specific practical
expertise to individual partners, both by NATO teams and by
individual Allies. We shall continue to develop all these
activities further, especially in the practical field, in order
to intensify our cooperation and to enhance our common security.
This is not a one-way street: the Allies are also benefiting
from the experience gained through the exchanges which are taking
place.We look forward to further discussions with our
cooperation partner colleagues, in particular on peacekeeping
issues, at our next meeting in the New Year.
- The crisis in former Yugoslavia has underlined the
importance of effective cooperation between the various
institutional components of the new European security
architecture. The security of Europe is inseparably linked to
that of North America: close transatlantic links and continued
presence of United States forces in Europe are therefore in the
interest of all Allies and remain vital to the security of the
Alliance. NATO will remain, as was agreed in Rome and
Maastricht, the essential forum for consultation among the Allies
and the forum for agreement on policies bearing on the security
and defence commitments of its members under the Washington
Treaty; NATO's collective defence will therefore remain the
primary responsibility of forces answerable to the WEU.We
continue to attach importance to mutual transparency and
complementarity between NATO and the WEU. We welcome the results
of the WEU Council Meeting in Rome on 20 November, which
confirmed that all European Allies would be given the opportunity
to participate fully in the activities of the WEU, as full
members, as associate members or observers, thereby reinforcing
the European pillar of the Alliance. We also welcome the
strengthening of the organisation and the operational role of the
WEU, notably the recent establishment in Brussels of the WEU
Planning Cell. We look forward to the forthcoming move of the
WEU Council and Secretariat to Brussels which will further
contribute to improved cooperation between NATO and the WEU.
- We welcomed the initiative of France and Germany to
establish a European Corps that is intended to be available for
Alliance missions and thus to provide a significant contribution
to strengthening the European pillar of the Alliance. SACEUR is
now undertaking negotiations with the two Chiefs of Defence Staff
concerned to establish a special agreement setting out the
detailed arrangements for the availability of the Corps in the
framework of the Alliance.
- The process of adapting the Alliance's structures to the new
security requirements continues. The transformation of NATO's
force and command structures has made good progress. We completed
our review of NATO's high-level command arrangements by agreeing
the detailed command structure for the Southern Region. We noted
that the necessary measures were already in hand to ensure the
timely implementation of the new Alliance command structure. We
also noted a document containing revised Military Committee
guidance for defence planning.
- In our Annual Review of national defence plans for 1993-1997
and beyond, we concluded that the commitment of forces to the
Alliance reaction forces is generally satisfactory. We welcomed
the establishment of the ACE Reaction Force Planning Staff at
SHAPE and the recent activation of the Headquarters of the ACE
Rapid Reaction Corps. However, a number of planned national
force reductions will have an effect on the future size and
capabilities of main defence forces, and we initiated a review of
the implications of changing force levels for the new force
structure.
- We noted that, while growing pressures on national defence
budgets will affect some existing modernisation plans, the
transfer of equipment following the CFE Treaty has led to
enhancement of the modernisation programmes of a number of
Allies. We considered a report on the Alliance's logistics
support capabilities and noted in particular changed requirements
for mobility and Host Nation Support. We also agreed that
military use of civil resources should be encouraged to promote
cost-effectiveness.
- We received an update by the United States on the status of
discussions with the Russian Federation and other states about
establishing a Global Protection System. We agreed that the
Alliance should continue to discuss the concept of a GPS, in the
context of a strategy designed to prevent the proliferation of
ballistic missiles.
- Armaments cooperation remains an important component of
Alliance security. NATO's Conventional Armaments Planning System
offers significant opportunities for achieving greater
cooperation. The increased emphasis on multinational forces also
requires higher levels of material standardisation and
interoperability. We welcomed the progress made by the
Conference of National Armaments Directors towards reforming and
streamlining Alliance policies, structures and procedures for
armaments cooperation, and look forward to the rapid
implementation of these improvements. We are also encouraged by
progress made to date in the development of a NATO Code of
Conduct for Defence Trade between the Allies, which should enable
all member countries to make the best possible use of their
limited defence procurement budgets.
- The infrastructure programme is a major success story of our
Alliance.However, an adaptation of the programme is needed to
meet the challenges of the new security environment, while
retaining the essential elements of the current programme. We
support the work that has been initiated to this end and we look
forward to receiving a report at our Spring meeting next year.
We agreed that it is necessary to continue to provide
infrastructure funding at a sufficient level to sustain both
existing commitments and a restructured programme adequate to
support the new Alliance strategy.
- The Alliance will continue to play a major role in
encouraging and underpinning stability in Europe. Because of its
transatlantic dimension, its experience and its unique military
structures and capabilities, NATO is well placed to assist the UN
and CSCE in their efforts to contain and resolve escalating
regional conflicts in Europe.The continuing process of adapting
Alliance structures to the new security environment will further
improve NATO's capabilities in this respect. The Alliance's
collective defence provides the essential basis for our own
security as well as making a crucial contribution to the
enhancement of security and stability in Europe as a whole.
|