Close
Back
Download NATO’s broadcast-quality video content free of charge
Log in
No account?
Forgot your password?
NATO MULTIMEDIA ACCOUNT
Access NATO’s broadcast-quality video content free of charge
Create an account
Check your inbox and enter verification code
We have sent a verification code to your email address.
.
Enter the code to verify your account. This code will expire in 30 minutes.
You have successfully created your account
From now on you can download videos from our website
Subscribe to our newsletter
If you would also like to subscribe to the newsletter and receive our latest updates, click on the button below.
Reset password
Enter the email address you registered with and we will send you a code to reset your password.
Reset password
We have sent a verification code to your email address.
Enter the code to verify your account. This code will expire in 30 minutes.
Create a new password
The password must be at least 12 characters long, no spaces, include upper/lowercase letters, numbers and symbols.
Your password has been updated
Click the button to return to the page you were on and log in with your new password.
Figures on the defence expenditures of NATO countries and Russia from 1985 to 2005 are now available on the NATO Web site.
The figures given in Table 1 represent payments actually made or to be made during the course of the fiscal year. They are based on the NATO definition of defence expenditures. In view of the differences between this and national definitions, the figures shown may diverge considerably from those which are quoted by national authorities or given in national budgets. For countries providing military assistance, this is included in the expenditures figures. For countries receiving assistance, figures do not include the value of items received. Expenditures for research and development are included in equipment expenditures and pensions paid to retirees in personnel expenditures.
Defence expenditures as of 2002 and personnel figures as of 2003 have been calculated on the basis of the revised NATO definition agreed in 2004, which excluded expenditure on Other Forces from the totals reported to NATO, except in the case of those elements of Other Forces which are structured, equipped and trained to support defence forces and which are realistically deployable. Most nations have reported defence expenditures according to this new definition, and in some cases (Greece, Hungary, Portugal and Turkey), this has resulted in a significant apparent decrease in defence expenditures. A few, however (France, Italy, Luxembourg and Netherlands ), continue to have difficulty meeting this requirement and the data provided by these countries did not fully accord with the new NATO definition on defence expenditures. For the Netherlands , data reflect the 2004 approved defence budget. For the Russian Federation , data was provided based on the previous NATO definition.
Summary
| Table 1: | Total defence expenditures |
| Table 2: | Gross domestic product (GDP) and defence expenditure annual volume change |
| Table 3: | Defence expenditures as % of GDP |
| Table 4: | GDP and defence expenditures per capita |
| Table 5: | Distribution of defence expenditures by category |
| Table 6: | Armed forces |
Reader's Guide
France is a member of the Alliance but does not belong to the integrated military structure and does not participate in collective force planning. The defence data relating to France are indicative only.
Iceland has no armed forces.
The Czech Republic , Hungary and Poland joined the Alliance in 1999.
From 2001 on, United Kingdom has changed its accounting system for defence expenditures from “cash basis” to “resource basis”.
For nine European NATO member countries, monetary values are expressed in national currencies up to 2001. As from 2002, they are expressed in euros.
Bulgaria , Estonia , Latvia , Lithuania , Romania , the Slovak Republic and Slovenia joined the Alliance in 2004.
From 2005 onwards, monetary values for Turkey are expressed in "New Turkish Lira".
To avoid any ambiguity the fiscal year has been designated by the year which includes the highest number of months: e.g. 2004 represents the fiscal year 2004/2005 for Canada and United Kingdom and the fiscal year 2003/2004 for the United States .
Because of rounding, the total figures may differ from the sum of their components.
Conventional signs:
| e | estimated | - | nil |
| .. | not available | // | not applicable |
| | | break in continuity of series | . | decimal point |